South Africa's ruling African National Congress (ANC) is pushing ahead with plans to amend the Constitution, potentially allowing for the expropriation of land without compensation. This contentious policy aims to address historical land injustices but has ignited fierce debate across the nation and drawn international scrutiny regarding property rights and economic stability. The proposed changes are currently navigating the parliamentary process in Cape Town.
Background: A Legacy of Dispossession and the Quest for Redress
The roots of South Africa's land debate are deeply embedded in its apartheid past, a system that systematically dispossessed the black majority of their land. By 1994, at the end of apartheid, approximately 87% of commercial agricultural land was owned by white South Africans, who constituted a minority of the population. This stark inequality persists, contributing to one of the highest Gini coefficients globally and fueling calls for radical land reform.
Following the democratic transition, Section 25 of the Constitution — often dubbed the "property clause" — mandated land reform, requiring that "the state must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to foster conditions which enable citizens to gain access to land on an equitable basis." It also stipulated that "property may be expropriated only in terms of law of general application… subject to compensation." For decades, the government pursued a "willing buyer, willing seller" model, which many within the ANC and its allies deemed too slow and ineffective.
The policy shift gained significant momentum at the ANC's 54th National Elective Conference in Nasrec, Johannesburg, in December 2017. Delegates resolved to amend Section 25 of the Constitution to explicitly allow for expropriation without compensation (EWC), a move championed by then-Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa. Upon assuming the presidency in February 2018, Ramaphosa publicly endorsed the resolution, framing it as a necessary step to accelerate land reform and foster economic inclusion.
Key Developments: The Constitutional Amendment Journey
Since the Nasrec resolution, the path to amending the Constitution has been a complex legislative and political journey. An Ad Hoc Committee to Amend Section 25 of the Constitution was established in Parliament, tasked with drafting the necessary changes. The committee received extensive public submissions, reflecting a wide spectrum of views from across South African society.
In December 2019, the committee published the Constitution Eighteenth Amendment Bill, which proposed adding a new subsection to Section 25, explicitly stating that "national legislation must set out specific circumstances where a court may determine that the amount of compensation is nil." This wording aimed to provide legal certainty on when EWC could be applied, moving away from a blanket approach.
Throughout 2020 and 2021, the Bill underwent further revisions and debates within Parliament. Specific circumstances where nil compensation might apply, as outlined by proponents, include abandoned land, land held for speculative purposes, land owned by state-owned enterprises, and highly indebted land where the owner has no intention of farming it. The ANC maintains that EWC would not undermine food security or the economy, emphasizing that it is not a land grab but a targeted measure to correct historical imbalances.
President Ramaphosa has consistently sought to reassure both domestic and international investors that the process would be managed responsibly, without jeopardizing the economy or agricultural production. However, opposition parties like the Democratic Alliance (DA) and the Freedom Front Plus (FF+) have vehemently opposed the amendment, arguing it would erode property rights, deter investment, and potentially lead to economic collapse. The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), on the other hand, have advocated for even more radical land expropriation, pushing for state custodianship of all land.
More Read
Impact: Economic, Social, and Agricultural Ramifications
The prospect of land expropriation without compensation has far-reaching implications across various sectors of South Africa.
Economic Uncertainty and Investment
One of the most immediate impacts has been heightened economic uncertainty. International credit rating agencies such as Moody's and S&P have cited the land reform debate as a risk factor to South Africa's economic outlook, potentially impacting foreign direct investment (FDI) and the country's ability to borrow at favorable rates. Investors are concerned about the precedent it sets for property rights and the rule of law. The banking sector also faces potential exposure, as agricultural land often serves as collateral for loans.
Agricultural Sector and Food Security
South Africa's agricultural sector, a significant contributor to GDP and employment, is particularly vulnerable. Commercial farmers, many of whom are white, express deep concerns about their tenure security and the future of their businesses. AgriSA, a prominent agricultural union, has warned that EWC could devastate the sector, leading to job losses, reduced production, and ultimately threatening food security for the nation's growing population. While proponents argue that productive land would not be targeted, the lack of clear, precise legal definitions creates apprehension.
Social Justice and Inequality
From a social perspective, the ANC argues that EWC is crucial for addressing historical injustices and promoting greater equality. Millions of landless South Africans, predominantly black, continue to live in poverty, with limited access to productive assets. Proponents believe that transferring land to these communities could unlock economic opportunities, foster rural development, and reduce inequality. However, critics caution that poorly managed land redistribution could lead to unproductive farms, further exacerbating poverty and unemployment, as seen in some other African nations.
Legal Challenges and Constitutional Precedent
Should the amendment pass, it is widely anticipated that it will face numerous legal challenges in the Constitutional Court. These challenges would likely focus on the interpretation of property rights, the definition of "nil" compensation, and the fairness of the legislative process. The outcome of such legal battles would set a significant constitutional precedent for South Africa's future.
More Read
What Next: Legislative Path and Implementation Hurdles
As of late 2023 and early 2024, the Constitution Eighteenth Amendment Bill continues its journey through the parliamentary process. It requires a two-thirds majority in the National Assembly and support from six of the nine provinces in the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) to pass. Given the ANC's current parliamentary majority, securing the necessary votes for the amendment remains a possibility, though not guaranteed without the support of smaller parties.
If the constitutional amendment is passed and assented to by the President, the focus will shift to the development of enabling legislation. This legislation would define the specific circumstances and procedures for expropriation without compensation, providing the legal framework for its practical implementation. This phase is expected to be equally contentious, as it will determine the operational details and safeguards.
The next general election, scheduled for 2024, will also play a crucial role. The land question remains a potent political issue, and the outcome of the elections could influence the pace and direction of land reform policies. International bodies and investors will continue to monitor South Africa's progress closely, with the policy's success or failure likely to have lasting implications for the country's economic standing and social cohesion.
