Syrian government internal security forces have recently re-entered several districts within Hasakeh city, a strategic hub in northeastern Syria. This significant deployment follows an agreement reached with the Kurdish-led Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (AANES), marking a pivotal shift in the region's complex power dynamics. The move represents a calculated concession by Kurdish authorities and a symbolic reassertion of state sovereignty by Damascus in an area largely outside its direct control for over a decade.
Background: A Decade of Evolving Control
Hasakeh, one of Syria's largest cities and the capital of the eponymous governorate, has experienced a tumultuous decade marked by shifting allegiances and fragmented control. Prior to the 2011 uprising, the city, like much of Syria, was firmly under the control of the central government in Damascus. However, as the Syrian civil war intensified, the Assad regime gradually withdrew its forces from many Kurdish-majority areas in 2012, redirecting resources to more critical fronts. This strategic retreat inadvertently paved the way for Kurdish political and military groups to establish de facto autonomy.
The Democratic Union Party (PYD) and its armed wing, the People's Protection Units (YPG), quickly filled the power vacuum, forming local councils and security forces (Asayish). By 2014, with the rise of the Islamic State (ISIS), the YPG, later forming the backbone of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), became a crucial ally for the US-led international coalition. This partnership led to the expansion of Kurdish-led control across vast swathes of northeastern Syria, including most of Hasakeh city. Throughout this period, the Syrian government maintained a limited presence within Hasakeh, primarily concentrated in a "security square" (al-Murabba' al-Amni) in the city center. This enclave housed key government institutions, security branches, and loyalist militias, creating a unique co-existence, often tense but generally stable, between two opposing administrations within the same urban landscape.
The turning point for broader Syrian government re-engagement in the north-east came in late 2019. Following the US decision to withdraw troops from certain border areas and Turkey's subsequent "Operation Peace Spring" against Kurdish forces, the SDF found itself strategically vulnerable. Faced with a looming Turkish offensive, the Kurdish-led administration sought protection from Damascus and its ally, Russia. This led to a series of agreements that saw the Syrian Army deploy to some border towns, primarily as a buffer against Turkish incursions, but largely respecting the internal administration of the AANES. The recent agreement concerning Hasakeh city, however, represents a more significant internal shift, expanding the Syrian government's presence beyond the established "security square" and into previously Kurdish-controlled neighborhoods.
Key Developments: The Terms of Re-entry
The recent agreement, reportedly brokered with Russian mediation, signifies a carefully negotiated expansion of Syrian government authority within Hasakeh city. Unlike previous arrangements that focused on border security, this accord specifically addresses internal security and administrative presence. Syrian internal security forces, primarily elements of the Ministry of Interior's police and security branches, have begun deploying to specific districts outside the long-standing "security square."
More Read
Sources indicate that the deployment is phased and coordinated, focusing initially on areas such as al-Ghuwairan, al-Nashwa, and parts of the city's southern and eastern neighborhoods. These areas had been under the exclusive control of the Kurdish-led Asayish forces for years. The agreement reportedly stipulates the return of certain state institutions and services, alongside the security forces. While details remain somewhat opaque, it is understood that the AANES has agreed to these deployments in exchange for certain guarantees, potentially related to continued autonomy in other areas or broader protection against external threats.
Crucially, this is not a complete handover of the city. The SDF and Asayish maintain a significant presence in other parts of Hasakeh, and the AANES continues to govern large swathes of the wider Hasakeh governorate. The agreement appears to be a pragmatic arrangement, allowing Damascus to assert a degree of sovereignty and extend its administrative reach, while the Kurdish-led forces retain substantial control, particularly over their military and political structures. Russian involvement has been instrumental in facilitating these complex negotiations, leveraging its influence with both Damascus and the AANES to ensure a relatively smooth, albeit cautious, transition. The move is viewed by many as a strategic concession by the AANES, driven by a desire to normalize relations with Damascus and secure its long-term position amidst ongoing regional uncertainties and pressures.
Impact: A Complex Web of Consequences
The re-entry of Syrian security forces into Hasakeh carries profound implications for various stakeholders, reshaping the political, security, and social landscape of northeastern Syria.
For the Local Population
Residents of Hasakeh, who have lived under Kurdish-led administration for years, face a period of adjustment. While some may welcome the return of state services and a potential reduction in internal checkpoints, others harbor deep-seated concerns about the practices of Syrian security forces, particularly regarding arbitrary arrests, conscription, and restrictions on freedoms previously enjoyed under the AANES. There are hopes for improved economic conditions and stability, but also anxieties about potential friction between the different security apparatuses now operating in closer proximity. The agreement could also affect the provision of basic services, with questions arising about the integration of AANES-established infrastructure with government systems.
For the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (AANES)
This agreement represents a significant strategic concession for the Kurdish-led administration. While it cedes direct control over certain urban areas, it could also be a calculated move to secure a more stable future. By allowing Damascus to reassert some sovereignty, the AANES might be seeking to legitimize its overall presence in Syria, gain a shield against Turkish aggression, and potentially open doors for future political dialogue with the central government. However, it also signifies a reduction in the AANES’s exclusive authority and raises questions about the long-term viability of its autonomous project.
For the Syrian Government
For Damascus, the re-entry into Hasakeh is a symbolic and strategic victory. It marks a gradual restoration of state sovereignty over territory that had been largely outside its direct control since the early days of the conflict. This move strengthens the government’s narrative of national unity and its objective to regain control over all Syrian territory. It also provides an opportunity to re-establish state institutions, collect taxes, and potentially access vital resources in the agriculturally rich and oil-producing Hasakeh governorate.
For Regional and International Powers
* Turkey: Ankara views the Kurdish-led administration as an extension of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), a designated terrorist organization. The re-establishment of Syrian government control, even partial, might be viewed with mixed feelings. While it could reduce the autonomy of Kurdish forces that Ankara opposes, it also strengthens the Assad regime, which Turkey has historically sought to weaken.
* United States: The US has been a primary backer of the SDF, providing military support and training. The expansion of Syrian government presence in Hasakeh further diminishes the exclusive influence of the US and its local partners, signaling a continued erosion of the US-backed project in northeastern Syria. It highlights the shifting geopolitical landscape and the limitations of US leverage in the region.
* Russia: As the primary mediator, Russia solidifies its role as a key power broker in Syria. This agreement demonstrates Moscow’s ability to navigate complex relationships and achieve outcomes that serve its strategic interests, primarily stabilizing the Assad regime and limiting the influence of rival powers.
* Iran: As a staunch ally of the Syrian government, Iran likely views this development positively, aligning with its broader objective of strengthening the Assad regime and consolidating the “axis of resistance.”
What Next: Navigating a Precarious Future
The re-entry of Syrian security forces into Hasakeh is unlikely to be the final chapter in the complex saga of northeastern Syria. Instead, it sets the stage for a new phase of interactions and potential challenges.
Integration of Services and Governance
A key milestone will be the practical integration of state services. This includes the re-opening of government schools, hospitals, civil registries, and utility providers. The efficiency and inclusivity of this integration will heavily influence public perception and the long-term success of the agreement. There will be a delicate balance between the existing AANES administrative structures and the returning government institutions.
Security Coordination and Potential Friction
The presence of multiple security forces – Syrian government police, military intelligence, and the Kurdish-led Asayish and SDF – within the same city could lead to friction. Future milestones will involve establishing clear lines of authority, joint patrol mechanisms, and conflict resolution protocols to prevent clashes. The potential for conscription by Syrian government forces remains a significant concern for local youth and a point of contention.
Broader Political Dialogue
This agreement could serve as a precursor to more comprehensive political negotiations between the AANES and the Syrian government. The Kurdish-led administration has consistently sought recognition for its autonomous structures within a decentralized Syria. The Hasakeh arrangement might be a confidence-building measure or a template for future discussions on the constitutional status of the AANES and the rights of Syria’s Kurdish population. However, significant ideological differences persist, making a grand bargain challenging.
Economic Implications
The return of government control could impact trade routes, taxation, and the distribution of resources, particularly oil and agricultural produce from the surrounding governorate. How these economic levers are managed will be crucial for the stability and prosperity of the region.
Regional Reactions and External Pressures
The developments in Hasakeh will continue to be closely watched by regional actors. Turkey may react with increased vigilance or further military posturing if it perceives the agreement as strengthening Kurdish autonomy elsewhere or solidifying Assad’s control too close to its borders. The US and its allies will continue to assess the implications for their remaining forces and their anti-ISIS mission. Russia will likely continue its mediating role, seeking to consolidate its influence and maintain a delicate balance.
The situation in Hasakeh underscores the fluid and unpredictable nature of the Syrian conflict. While the recent agreement offers a glimmer of potential de-escalation and a pathway towards a more unified Syria, it is fraught with complexities and the potential for new tensions. The coming months will reveal whether this tactical shift can evolve into a sustainable framework for peace and stability in a region long accustomed to fragmentation and conflict.
