The Rough Rider's Shadow: Is Trump's Foreign Policy Echoing Roosevelt?
Recent actions by former U.S. President Donald Trump, particularly concerning Venezuela and Greenland, have sparked discussions about historical precedents in U.S. foreign policy. Many observers are drawing parallels to the approach of Theodore Roosevelt, a president known for his assertive international stance in the early 20th century.
Background: The Era of the “Big Stick”
Theodore Roosevelt served as the 26th President of the United States from 1901 to 1909. His foreign policy philosophy, often referred to as "Big Stick Diplomacy," emphasized the use of U.S. military power to protect American interests and exert influence globally. Roosevelt believed in a strong military and a willingness to intervene in other nations' affairs to maintain stability and ensure access to resources.
A prime example of this approach was the construction of the Panama Canal, a project that required U.S. intervention in Panama to secure the necessary rights and control. Roosevelt also played a significant role in mediating the end of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905, demonstrating a willingness to act as an international arbiter.
Key Developments: Venezuela and Greenland Under Scrutiny
Trump's administration adopted a similarly assertive posture in Venezuela. From 2017 to 2019, the U.S. imposed sanctions on the Venezuelan government, led by Nicolás Maduro, aiming to pressure him to hold free and fair elections. The Trump administration recognized Juan Guaidó, then the interim president of the National Assembly, as the legitimate leader of Venezuela.
In Greenland, Trump repeatedly expressed interest in purchasing the territory. In late 2020 and early 2021, the U.S. made formal offers to buy Greenland from the Danish government, valued at approximately $75 billion. These offers were ultimately rejected by the Danish government and the Greenlandic parliament.
Impact: Geopolitical Shifts and Domestic Debate
The U.S. sanctions on Venezuela have had a devastating impact on the country's economy and population. The Venezuelan economy has suffered hyperinflation, leading to widespread shortages of food, medicine, and other essential goods. Millions of Venezuelans have fled the country as refugees.
The Greenland purchase offers generated significant debate both domestically and internationally. Critics argued that such a purchase would be economically impractical and raise questions about U.S. sovereignty and its role in Arctic affairs. Supporters argued that acquiring Greenland would provide strategic advantages in the Arctic region, particularly in light of potential resource discoveries and geopolitical competition with Russia.
More Read
What Next: The Future of U.S. Foreign Policy
Venezuela
The Biden administration has largely maintained the sanctions regime against the Maduro regime, although with some adjustments to humanitarian aid provisions. The U.S. continues to support Guaidó and advocates for democratic reforms in Venezuela. The situation remains volatile, with ongoing political and economic challenges.
Greenland
The U.S. has not renewed its offers to purchase Greenland. However, the Arctic region remains a focus of U.S. foreign policy, with increased attention on climate change, resource management, and military readiness. The U.S. is investing in infrastructure and research in the Arctic, and is working with allies to address challenges in the region.
The comparisons between Trump's foreign policy and Roosevelt's "Big Stick Diplomacy" remain a subject of debate among political analysts. While both leaders pursued assertive foreign policies, there are also significant differences in their approaches and the context in which they operated. The long-term consequences of these policies, particularly in Venezuela, are still unfolding.
